Patients and research methods
Dr. McCoy and her team used patient data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011–2014) and the OptumLabs Data Warehouse to conduct this study. They first estimated the prevalence of intensive glucose-lowering therapy among U.S. adults using the most recently available National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Then the researchers determined the approximate number of hypoglycemia-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations attributable to such intensive therapy using OptumLabs data obtained in the earlier study.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data identified more than 10.7 million nonpregnant adults with diabetes whose hemoglobin A1C was in the range recommended by clinical guidelines (less than 7%). The researchers found that almost 22% of these individuals were intensively treated. Individuals were considered to be receiving intensive treatment if they were taking a medication to achieve HbA1C levels of 5.6% or less, or were taking two or more medications to achieve HbA1C levels of 5.7–6.4%.
“Hypoglycemia, or low blood glucose, is one of the most common serious adverse effects of diabetes therapy, causing both immediate and long-term harm to patients who experience it,” says Dr. McCoy. “Severe hypoglycemia, defined by the need for another person to help the patient treat and terminate their hypoglycemic event, is associated with increased risk of death, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, falls and fractures, and poor quality of life.”
To gain further insight, the investigators also subcategorized patients as clinically complex if the patient:
- Was age 75 or older
- Had two or more limitations on daily living activities, such as the inability to dress, feed, walk from room to room, or get in or out of bed
- Had end-stage kidney disease
- Had three or more chronic conditions
Of the 10.7 million patients, 32.3% were clinically complex. Although this did not appear to be a factor in whether a person was intensively treated, Dr. McCoy notes that it would have been ideal if it had been.
“Older people and others we consider clinically complex are more at risk to develop hypoglycemia, as well as experience other adverse events because of intensive or overtreatment. However, at the same time, these patients are unlikely to benefit from intensive therapy rather than moderate glycemic control,” says Dr. McCoy. “When we develop a diabetes treatment plan, our goal should be to maximize benefit while reducing harm and burden of treatment.”
Dr. McCoy says that the researchers found the study results alarming, with as many as 2.3 million Americans overtreated between 2011 and 2014. Moreover, clinically complex patients were intensively treated at a similar rate as patients who were not complex.
Next steps
Historically, professional societies and regulatory bodies largely focused on reducing undertreatment and controlling hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). Dr. McCoy hopes to see a shift to also include addressing and preventing overtreatment and hypoglycemia.
“We need to align treatment regimens and goals with each patient’s clinical situation, health status, psychosocial situation, and reality of everyday life to ensure that care is consistent with their goals, preferences and values,” she says.
If the health care system shifts from being disease-focused — and for diabetes, specifically, glucose-focused — to being more person-focused, she believes that will be less harmful, and lead to better outcomes for patients and less treatment burden.
For patients with diabetes, she says, “this includes treatment de-intensification and simplification as a means of reducing hypoglycemia, polypharmacy and treatment burden.”
Reprinted with permission from the Mayo Clinic, a nonprofit organization committed to clinical practice, education and research, providing expert, comprehensive care to everyone who needs healing. The original article can be found here.