When vision loss signals more than an eye problem
In many cases, early signs of diabetes-related vision damage manifest before other complications. They can indicate complications in the kidneys or heart. Protecting vision, therefore, presents a broader opportunity to intervene early and reduce the risk of more severe systemic complications. In fact, the real culprit is the condition’s painless, asymptomatic progression, which makes early detection difficult without screening.
Treatment options such as laser therapy, anti-VEGF injections, and vitrectomy can slow or stop vision loss when detected early. However, these treatments cannot restore vision once it is lost, making timely screening essential for preserving vision and overall health. Treatment for Shamsul’s right eye involved laser therapy and intravitreal injections. He also underwent a vitrectomy and laser procedure with silicone oil injections in his left eye. Six months later, the silicone oil was removed, and a cataract extraction with a lens implant was performed. Shamsul continues to attend regular follow-up appointments and receives additional injections in his right eye when needed.
Unequal access, unequal outcomes
Data from the IDF Diabetes Atlas indicate striking regional variations in the prevalence of diabetes-related retinopathy, particularly in parts of Europe and Southeast Asia, where disparities in access to prevention and care are evident. However, it is best to err on the side of caution when interpreting these figures since estimates often depend on the populations studied and the methods used for disease detection. Hospital-based research tends to show higher levels of DR because it captures individuals who are already experiencing symptoms. In contrast, community-based screening tends to provide a more accurate picture of the population.
Studies using handheld or smartphone-based cameras in rural areas make screening possible where hospital infrastructure is limited. Still, image quality and field of view can be lower than in clinical settings with some studies excluding ungradable images, which can further skew prevalence estimates. Ethnicity adds another important dimension: people of South Asian and Black descent are more likely to develop diabetes and its complications, underlining the need for localised strategies that consider entire population characteristics and resources. The differences between regions are not only the result of biology or technology but also of policy and investment.
When countries prioritise regular screening and timely treatment, diabetes-related vision loss declines. One such example is the National Diabetic Eye Screening Programme in the UK. Following its introduction in the early 2000s, diabetes-related vision loss fell by half within just five years. The screening is carried out by trained photographers and graders rather than ophthalmologists, allowing specialists to focus on people who need advanced care. Clinics operate in hospitals, primary care practices, community centres and mobile vans, to screen people wherever they live.
Outcomes from the UK model demonstrate that investment in prevention saves both sight and money. While systematic screening requires upfront costs in staff training, equipment and coordination, it reduces long-term healthcare expenses associated with vision loss and disability. The approach also underscores that screening is only effective when linked to treatment.